38
looks more than probable that these people will pay the
higher tax out of ignorance as they will fail to claim their
rights and produce "les justifications nécessaires".
of obtaining exemption is thrown upon the taxpayer.
onus
5. Reference to the "Handbook of British Commercial
Treaties 1924" seems to show that the two principal Treaties
which govern our relations with France are those of January
26th, 1826 and February 28th, 1882 both of which were denounced
by France on Septcmber 10th, 1918 but are being continued in
force, subject to three months notice. Though India and Ceylon
had Customs Conventiona (also denounced on September 10th, 1918)
in which Indochina was specifically mentioned, these are the
only two references I can find to Indochina as ar es the United
Kingdom or neighbouring British Colonies in the Far East are
concerned. In fact though at various periods we have extended
the rights given to french subjects in the United Kingdom by
the two abovementioned Treaties to British Colonies not posses 8-
ing responsible Governavnt in Europe, yet france does not
appear to have done the same for British residents in her
Colonies, except in so far as certain Dominions and Colonies
have made special Customs agreements with France.
6.
I have therefore the honour to request that I may be
instructed definitely whether the third paragraph of Article I
of the Treaty of February 28ta, 1882 (denounced but still
temporarily in force) applies to British subjects in French Indo-
China or whether British subjacta here cannot claim to be
placed on the footing of "Nations who have agreed to charge
*French subjecta the same taxation as their own Nationals".
In the meantime I have acknowledged the Governor's
1.
letter
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.